![]() The same thing goes for nVidia’s long-delayed NV100-based family of products.īut as of SC09, the top five performing products for SGEMM 4K x 4K are as follows :ġ. We don’t have information about SGEMM performance of Evergreen GPUs but as soon as we learn the numbers – we’ll let you know. Long story short, the real-world SGEMM performance of AMD’s FireStream 9270 board is 300 GFLOPS, weaker than GT200. Thus, the Radeon 4800 family comes with 160 cores comparable to nVidia 30 clusters with 8 fully-featured cores i.e. ![]() As we disclosed on numerous occasions, AMD introduced the 1Fat+4Thin concept with the ATI Radeon 2900XT, pulling in a Core cluster consists out of one unit for transcendental operations and four units for Multiply-Add/Add/Integer-Add/Dot operations. But those efforts cannot accommodate for architectural limitations. When it comes to GPGPU world, AMD ditched everything else to focus on OpenCL development and the results will come in 2010. AMD’s architecture is very strong in theoretical performance and in real-world gaming. One might mention AMD GPU line-up being more efficient than nVidia one, but unfortunately the situation is rather complex due to interesting state of AMD GPGPU developments. Thus, Larrabee today comes at 2.7x math performance of GT200 chip. Now, we can debate the numbers all we want, but the fact of the matter is that nVidia Tesla C1060 delivers only 370 GFLOPS in an identical SGEMM 4Kx4K calculation. A couple of minutes before the end of the keynote, Justin added the infamous “And one more thing…” Initial overclocked performance was 913 GFLOPS, moved slowly past 919 GLOPS, bounced up to 997 GFLOPS and ultimately passed the 1TFLOPS barrier with 1006 GFLOPS. The keynote continued while the engineers scrambled at the back to try to beat the 1TFLOPS barrier. Of course, there is a “but” coming – unlike theoretical numbers that are usually disclosed by ATI and nVidia – this was an actual SGEMM benchmark calculation used in the HPC community. While looking at the numbers alone, one might think that these scores are below the level of ATI Radeon 4850 and nVidia GeForce GTX 280/GTX 285. ![]() During Justin Rattner’s keynote, Intel demonstrated the performance of LRB as it stands today.Īt SGEMM Performance test, Intel achieved 417 GFLOPS using half the cores on the prototype card, and reached 825 GFLOPS by enabling all the cores. Back in 2006, when we first got the first details about Larrabee, the performance goal 16 cores, 2.0 GHz clock, 150W TDP”. Display ConnectorsĪPIs supported by FireStream 9370, sometimes including their particular versions.During the recently held SC09 conference in Portland, Oregon – Intel finally managed to reach its original performance goal for Larrabee. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model. Types and number of video connectors present on FireStream 9370. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM. Parameters of memory installed on FireStream 9370: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Information on FireStream 9370's compatibility with other computer components. Pipelines / CUDA coresĬompatibility, dimensions and requirements These parameters indirectly speak of FireStream 9370's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results. FireStream 9370's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |